For many people in Africa and Asia colonial rule by
Europe was a major part of their history and a new element of their experience during
the nineteenth century. This was seen as the second wave of European Conquest
as this followed Europe’s conquest of the America’s. It was now focused mainly
on Asian and Africa.
This
conquest was conditioned by the Industrial Revolution, and their motives and
actions were shaped by the military capacity and the economic power that also
coincided with the Industrial Revolution. Generally, most Europeans preferred informal
control, as it was cheaper and less likely to provoke wars, though this did now
remain the case. Because more European countries wanted to take over different
parts or local authorities refused to cooperate with the powers, Europeans had
no problem with taking the expenses and moving to direct colonial rule. This
involved the use of military forces and or the threat of using them. This was available
for them to use because the Industrial Revolution has also made arms much
stronger, and they were overwhelmingly advanced with firepower and machine
guns. Though it took a long time, European power prevailed virtually everywhere
across Africa and Asia. Many of those countries that were overtaken lost the
political sovereignty and freedom of action.
For
countries such as India and Indonesia, colonial rule was something that had
developed from earlier interaction with European trading bases. The absence of
any sense of cultural and political unity was an open invitation to Europeans
and allowed them to seize and take over. It evolved very slowly, but surely.
This
method was not the same in Africa, mainland South Asia, and the Pacific
Islands, as colonial rule was more abrupt and deliberate. This was because of
the “scramble for Africa” as many European parties fought against one another
for land. This process was nowhere near peaceful, and was an idea of who owned
what, as it used bloody military action. As for the land and conquest of
Australia and New Zealand, it was similar to the conquest and colonization of
North America. Europeans brought settlement and diseases. These areas became colonies,
“neo-European” societies.
In
many places and for many these colonial rule and European incorporation was a
traumatic experience. Although all this violence existed, there were many people
who were willing to cooperate for their own advantages. This was available
because colonial rulers relied heavily on a range of local intermediaries.
Also, both colonial governments and private missionary organizations promoted a
measure of European education. This led Europeans to increasingly depend on the
Western-educated class at the expense of the more traditional elites.
Even
so colonial rule provoked the bitter opposition of many others. There were
periodic rebellions, large and small in size, where one of the more famous ones
was the Indian Rebellion. This rebellion
was triggered by military forces smearing a new cartridge in the fat from cows
and pigs. This offended both Hindus and Muslims. A mutiny among Indian troops
in Bengal triggered this rebellion, which then began to spread to other regions
of the colony. Though it was destroyed the rebellion had greatly divided the
races in colonial India. “It made the British more conservative and cautious
about deliberately trying to change Indian society for fear of provoking
another rebellion. Moreover, it convinced the British government to assume
direct control over India…”
No comments:
Post a Comment