Europe in comparison to Asian Commerce was very
behind in the game, but came in with strong force to own the game. The game in
speak is trade and the trade routes within the Indian Ocean and the areas
surrounding. Many European countries began to trickle in this system, seeing
how much money it could bring about, yet not having anything worth trading for.
This lead them to have to pay using silver or gold for goods, such as Chinese
silk, Indian cotton, and a multitude of different spices. Europe has just recovered
from the Black Plague and their population was growing. Each country made their
ways differently into the trade route, treated the people in different ways,
but they all contributed to this new regime of globalized trade.
The first of European countries to attempt trade
started with the Portuguese. This new diverse area was different than what the
Portuguese knew but they quickly took charge as best they could. Had they
attempted to participate peacefully the could have done so, but the fact of the
matter is, is that they had nothing precious or worthy to offer up, as whatever
goods they could muster up were seen as unattractive in Asian markets. What
else fueled them in not being peaceful, is taking in note of how Indian Ocean
merchant ships were mostly un-armed and they also strongly lacked in canons on
their ships as the Portuguese had. They
used their military advantage and quickly set bases for themselves. The
Portuguese claimed these bases forcibly and without mercy, causing much
bloodshed. Their actions are what led to the term, and what set up other
countries to do the same, known as “trading post Empire.” Because the Portuguese
were one of the first Europeans to come along they attempted to enforce other
trading ships to purchase a pass and to pay duties of 6 to 10% of others
cargoes. However, the Portuguese began to revert to their ancient ways, as they
still had nothing to offer up in trade, and they were completely outnumbered by
Asian traders.
After the Portuguese came the Spaniards and their
conquest of what they named the Philippine Islands. It was easy for Spain to
take over the Philippine Islands as they had very small and weak military
societies; there was neither king nor anyone who ruled people. The Spaniards
also took this opportunity because of the close proximity to China and that it
was a spice island. There take over, unlike the Portuguese was often bloodless
and relatively easy. Later on however there would Chinese revolts that would
lead to massacres by the Spaniards.
After the Spaniards the Dutch and the English joined
in on the trading. Both these countries were stronger militarily and
economically than Portugal. They organized their own Indian Ocean ventures
through private trading companies unlike the Portuguese. The Dutch focused on
Indonesia while England focused on India. The Dutch were harsh with their rule
over Indonesia forcing the people to sell only to them, and if they refused
they would burn the crops. The British East India Company worked differently
than that of the Dutch. They established
three major trading settlements, and instead of forcing themselves onto the
land they secured their trading bases with permission of Mughal authorities or
local rulers, later becoming heavily involved with trading with Asia. However, both England and the Dutch’s trading
post began to evolve into a more conventional form of colonial domination. This
is something that happened in the beginning with that of the Portuguese and
with what we see with Spain. The idea to rule may not be the first thought as
trade bases are set up but as opportunities open, the European countries take
it the moment it is laid out in the open for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment